USING TRUTH TABLES TO TEST FOR VALIDITY

The four connectives (or operators) we have used so far are all binary, meaning they link two distinct elements. There is also the unary operator for negation (NOT). Its effect is to reverse the original value of a proposition. For simplicity, we will not isolate this operator in the following charts but show its effect in how we color the areas.

The principal use of truth tables in symbolic logic is to test for deductive validity. What this means is that we are trying to determine whether there even is the possibility that a combination of true premises could imply a false conclusion. See the difference in the two examples below. The first represents a pattern that is valid, and the main connective is always "true." The second represents an invalid pattern, which once has a "false" main connective. (Think of the main connective--the one for implication, in this case--as carrying the truth value of the entire complex proposition.)

(That) logic is easy only if everyone studies but not everyone studies implies logic is not easy.
T (logic is easy) T T (everyone studies) F F (everyone studies) T F (logic is easy)
T F F F T T F
F T T F F T T
F T F T
T T T
((P -> Q) & ~Q) -> ~P
T T T F F T F
T F F F T T F
F T T F F T T
F T F T
T T T
(That) logic is easy only if everyone studies and everyone studies implies logic is easy.
T (logic is easy) T T (everyone studies) T T (everyone studies) T T (logic is easy)
T F F F F T T
F T T T T F F
F T F F F T F
((P -> Q) & Q) -> P
T T T T T T T
T F F F F T T
F T T T T F F
F T F F F T F
Either go forward to how to complete a truth table or go back and review the use of connectives.